RE: Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0521, Menthol in Cigarettes, Tobacco Products; Request for Comments

September 8, 2013

Leslie Kux, Assistant Commissioner for Policy

c/o Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305)

U.S. Food and Drug Administration

5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061

Rockville, MD 20852.

Dear Assistant Commissioner Kux:

On behalf of the American Conservative Union (ACU), the oldest and largest grassroots conservative organization in the nation, I am writing to express our strong opposition to the establishment of the Food and Drug Administration of a tobacco product standard for menthol in cigarettes.

As with most expansions of government authority, we believe that such a product standard, and especially an outright ban, would not only fail to achieve its ostensible goals – the promotion of smoking cessation and prevention of smoking by youth – but would in fact be counterproductive.  In addition, a menthol product standard or ban would have a significant negative effect on retailers and the economy, cost thousands of jobs, reduce state revenues, and greatly burden law enforcement, factors the FDA must consider in any rulemaking.

The unintended consequences of a menthol rule stem from the likelihood that banning or restricting menthol use would result in the dramatic expansion of the black market in cigarettes.  Menthol cigarettes currently comprise one-third of the market, providing a major opportunity for contraband activity and counterfeiters.  Numerous authorities, including the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms and Tobacco, the Government Accountability Office and the Virginia Crime Commission have confirmed the extensive current activities of counterfeiters.  Adding a monopoly on menthol cigarettes to their product offerings would dramatically expand their business.

 This black market represents a major public health challenge.  Counterfeit cigarettes have been found to contain far greater concentrations of harmful compounds, creating health risks that would more than offset any benefits of removing menthol.  Moreover, black-market operators, by avoiding taxation, sell their products below market price and do not respect laws restricting the sale of cigarettes to minors, therefore undercutting efforts to promote smoking cessation and prevent young people from starting the habit.  (Under the “We Card” initiative, retailers have reportedly reduced the success of underage smokers to purchase cigarettes from 76 percent to under six percent.)

For the same reason, an expansion of the black market would also cost the Federal government and states desperately needed revenues on top of an estimated loss of $5 billion annually due to contraband activity.  http://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphillipserb/2013/08/20/up-in-flames-cigarette-taxes-create-opportunity-for-revenue-and-crime/

Retailers could be hit extremely hard.  According to various industry sources, cigarettes account for between 30 and 40 percent of sales by convenience stores, which provide more than five million desperately needed jobs. Eliminating all sales of menthol cigarettes could cost $7.6 billion and lead to price increases for non-tobacco products.

And of course, by definition any new counterfeit activity would create new headaches for law enforcement and even national security concerns.  The BATF has noted that “(t)raditional organized crime,” terrorist groups and street gangs are all involved in contraband cigarette trafficking, and that it has become the subject of gang wars.  Counterfeit cigarettes have been used to fund criminal elements, and it has been estimated that 50 percent of contraband cigarettes originate in China.

Like many regulatory proceedings, the issue of whether to ban menthol cigarettes concerns questions of freedom and responsibility on the one hand and, on the other hand, the use of government force to compel preferred behavior. On that spectrum, the conclusion is obvious:  The government does not have the right to compel preferred behavior.

The integrity of science-based regulatory decisions demands that the FDA process not be façade for a foregone conclusion regarding menthol in cigarettes.   America does not need another unnecessary regulatory initiative that diminishes consumer freedom and personal choice.

Given the potential public health, economic, law enforcement and even security risks for unregulated cigarette marketing that could be produced by a menthol product standard or restriction on sales, it is clear that such an action would not be in the best interests of the public and would undermine important government objectives.  Accordingly, the American Conservative Union urges the FDA not to move forward with regulatory action in this regard.

Sincerely,

Larry Hart

Director of Government Relations

American Conservative Union

Join ACU

The ACU Blog

What happened to Chief Justice Roberts?

The Hill By: Charles N. W. Keckler

Ten years ago, a promising conservative jurist outlined the principle by which King v. Burwell should have been

“Today’s opinion creates the Church of the Supreme Court,” says ACU’s Schlapp

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEJune 26, 2015

ACU Chairman Matt Schlapp on today’s Supreme Court decision in “Obergefell v. Hodges”:

“The

ACU’S Schlapp on King v. Burwell: “Justice Roberts and the other concurring five justices have disgraced their office, sprayed graffiti on the Constitution, and set America on a path toward a constitutional crisis.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 25, 2015

For More Information Contact: Ian Walters iwalters@conservative.org 202.347.9388

(Washington, DC) Today, The American Conservative Union (ACU) Chairman

ACU’s Center for Statesmanship and Diplomacy Hosts Panel On Iran Nuclear Deal As Their First Event

Related

CPAC 365

Save the date for CPAC 2016!

CPAC 2016 will be March 2nd – 5th, 2016 at the Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center.

This gives conservatives and our like-minded

[Event] Iran Nuclear Deal: What Can We Expect?

June19Event

The Iran Nuclear Deal:  What Can We Expect?

This summer, President Obama and Secretary Kerry seek to establish a nuclear

Hillary Clinton’s Voting Rights Speech Forgets Veterans, Ignores Popular Opinion

hillary

Written By: Spencer Brown

In a speech on voting rights in Houston, Texas, Thursday afternoon, democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton outlined three groups of disenfranchised

Give it up, Republicans. Your base is dying off

CPAC1

“The people I see at Conservative events contain vast numbers of young activists.”

Hot Air By:  Jazz Shaw

As we “all know” from listening

Founded in 1964, the American Conservative Union (ACU) is the original conservative organization in the nation. For more than forty years, ACU has served as an umbrella organization harnessing the collective strength of conservative organizations fighting for Americans who are concerned with liberty, personal responsibility, traditional values, and strong national defense. As America's premier conservative voice, ACU is the leading entity in providing conservative positions on issues to Congress, the Executive Branch, State Legislatures, the media, political candidates, and the public. Read More

1331 H St NW Suite 500
Washington, DC 20005
Ph: (202) 347-9388 | Fx: (202) 347-9389

Contact Us
Privacy Policy
Opportunities/Careers

ACU. All Rights Reserved.