June 18, 2013
June 19, 2013
Dear Member of Congress:
For years, we have advocated the need for a free market in sugar and believe that reform proposals put forth must not dismantle U.S. policy without first addressing the foreign subsidies that are grossly distorting world sugar prices. Unilateral disarmament and increased dependence on foreign sugar suppliers cannot be the first step to achieving a fair and open market.
We urge Congress to consider a zero-for-zero strategy where U.S. trade officials aggressively target foreign market-distorting policies. Once these subsidies are removed, U.S. sugar producers have agreed to eliminate the U.S. sugar program, which consists of non-recourse loans, marketing quotas and tariffs.
Subsidies from all major sugar exporters, including Thailand, India, the European Union and Central America, should be addressed. But immediate priority should be placed on eradicating policies in Brazil and Mexico, which are the biggest hurdles to free trade in U.S. sugar.
Brazil’s three decades of subsidies—ranging from sugar ethanol usage mandates to direct subsidy checks, special bailout packages, soft loans, preferential tax breaks and debt forgiveness—have helped the nation grab a market-monopolizing 50 percent share of global sugar exports. And, the country is currently expanding its subsidization in hopes of growing this unprecedented price manipulating power.
Mexico enjoys direct government ownership of 20 percent of the country’s sugar industry. The government produces 1 million tons of sugar a year, and a loophole in NAFTA allows Mexico to slip more than 1 million tons of sugar into the U.S. market. This scheme enables Mexico to artificially inflate its domestic prices and keep an inefficient industry afloat while artificially depressing U.S. prices to harm its main North American competitor.
In order to advance a true free-market solution, we ask you to focus on reforming sugar subsidies abroad before putting America’s economic and food security priorities at risk.
|Al Cardenas||Chairman, American Conservative Union|
|Stephen DeMaura||President, Americans for Job Security|
|Colin Hanna||Colin Hanna, President, Let Freedom Ring|
|George Landrith||President and CEO, Frontiers of Freedom|
|Andrew Langer||President, Institute for Liberty|
|Jim Martin||Chairman, 60 Plus Association|
|Seton Motley||President, lessgovernment.org|
|Chuck Muth||President, Citizen Outreach|
To read a PDF version of the letter, please click here.
The Hill By: Charles N. W. Keckler
Ten years ago, a promising conservative jurist outlined the principle by which King v. Burwell should have been
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEJune 26, 2015
ACU Chairman Matt Schlapp on today’s Supreme Court decision in “Obergefell v. Hodges”:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 25, 2015
For More Information Contact: Ian Walters email@example.com 202.347.9388
(Washington, DC) Today, The American Conservative Union (ACU) Chairman
CPAC 2016 will be March 2nd – 5th, 2016 at the Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center.
This gives conservatives and our like-minded
The Iran Nuclear Deal: What Can We Expect?
This summer, President Obama and Secretary Kerry seek to establish a nuclear
Written By: Spencer Brown
In a speech on voting rights in Houston, Texas, Thursday afternoon, democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton outlined three groups of disenfranchised