
Bob Barr
Color-code
mania
A modest proposal for a more effective threat-level system
February
5, 2004
as published in Creative Loafing
It
used to be that the worst fate befalling someone suffering from color
blindness would be to walk into a business meeting with a mismatched suit
and tie, or with one sock black and the other blue.
Nowadays,
the stakes are much higher. In fact, with all the color-coded warnings
bombarding us, I worry that some poor soul suffering from color blindness
might be shot on sight because he or she misread a government warning.
Add to the
already confusing Homeland Security color-code alerts the new passenger
profiling color codes (currently being implemented by the airport security
folks) and those surveillance cameras with red lights sprouting up all
over the place, and you've got a recipe for sheer disaster.
As always,
your friend, Bob, has cooked up a solution. To ensure that every citizen
and every visitor to our country has equal access to the vital colors
now controlling our lives -- in other words, to ensure that we'll have
truly nondiscriminatory color codes -- we need to institute a new system
and, of course, a new acronym. I suggest the COLOR System (the Controlling
Our Lives through Omnipresent Regulations System).
The Homeland
Security Department's existing five-level threat condition hierarchy,
comprised of red (severe), orange (high), yellow (elevated), blue (guarded)
and green (low), is far too limiting and confusing. I mean, what do "elevated"
and "guarded" mean, and when exactly do we transition from one
to the other? Do you stick out your foot and trip a "suspicious person"
if the threat is "elevated" but not if it's as low as "guarded"?
At what level of "threat" can you just pull out your gun and
shoot someone who looks "suspicious"?
And why are
there only five threat levels? I doubt the terrorists limit themselves
to a mere five attack levels. Given the powers available to government,
and considering that the government already regulates virtually every
aspect of our lives, is it really reasonable to cram all that power into
just five threat levels? I think not.
What we really
need is a more extensive code system, which the new COLOR System would
bring us. To more precisely alert us each day exactly what the Homeland
Security folks believe the threat level is, COLORS would have not five,
but 25 different levels.
For example,
instead of the overly inclusive "yellow," which under the current
system signifies an "elevated" threat level (which could mean
just about anything), the new system would have five shades of yellow.
In this way,
Americans would be better able to understand the precise threat level
facing them at the start of each day, and be better prepared to meet the
challenges posed by that threat level. You might subdivide yellow this
way:
- "Legal
Pad Yellow," the lowest yellow level, would signify a threat sufficient
to require legal advice.
- "Lemon
Yellow" would require you to cut and run.
- "Mustard
Yellow" would signify the French are coming.
- "Highlighter
Yellow" would require reading the fine print.
- "Canary
Yellow" would be the highest "yellow" level of all, requiring
flight.
Each of the
other four major alert levels would be similarly broken down into their
own sub-tones ("Greenback Green," "Blood Red," "Outback
Orange," etc.).
Regardless
of whether she spends time in the Big House (or perhaps even as part of
her community service), Martha Stewart could advise us all on the universally
recognized shades of red, orange, yellow, blue and green. They would be
placed on color-coded charts, which would then be a required display in
every home, business and public building.
For the colorblind,
each shade in the COLOR System would be accompanied by a numbered code,
which could even more precisely tell the citizen the particular threat
level for that day. For example, "Legal Pad Yellow 3.35" would
require slightly greater vigilance than "Legal Pad Yellow 3.25";
"Blood Red 5.95" would tell each of us the game's up and it's
too late anyhow, so don't worry. No longer would citizens aimlessly wander
about asking total strangers, "What is the threat today, Citizen?"
"Need we worry today, Neighbor?" "Must we bring out our
duct tape today or might we rely on our deadbolts only, Mr. Government
Official?"
See how much
simpler life would be? How much safer you'd feel? How much more soundly
you'd sleep?
Because the
daily color code would be broadcast repeatedly and placed by regulation
on the front page of every newspaper, everyone would be aware of the specific
color and numeric designation at any moment. No person, not even the color-impaired,
would be less informed than any other.
Adding Braille
would completely round out the picture. We'd truly be an equal threat-awareness
society. I can hardly wait, and somehow I don't think the wait will be
long.
Former U.S. Rep. Bob Barr is a frequent commentator on political and
social issues and the chairman of the American Conservative Union Foundation's
21st Century Center for Privacy and Freedom |